Skip to content
AI-Native PM
Field Notes

Field Note

What We Built for This Site and Then Deleted

Some of the best decisions here are things you will never see, because we built them and then cut them. Deciding what to throw away is the same judgment as deciding what to make, and it is harder when the making was cheap.

· 5 min read

Some of the best decisions on this site are things you will never see, because we built them and then deleted them. A luminous border treatment for the hero image, worked up as a set of options across a whole preview lab, tried in light and dark, then reverted because it did not actually make the image better. A value map for the home page, drawn first as a tall branching diagram, scrapped because it made readers scroll down to puzzle at something they could not follow. A readiness quiz that placed people into a level, dropped in favor of letting them choose for themselves. A standalone diagnostic page, removed once it became clear nothing relied on it. A round of home-page color and hero treatments, all built, none kept. A field note, drafted and published, then deleted because it did not land.

What we kept, beside what we built and deletedTwo columns. Kept, with checks: dark mode, the horizontal value map, the Perspectives and Tactics split. Deleted, struck out: the luminous hero border, the vertical value map, the readiness quiz, the diagnostic page. Caption: deciding what to cut was half the judgment.SOME OF IT WE MADE, THEN CUTKEPTBUILT, THEN DELETEDDark modeThe horizontal value mapPerspectives / Tactics splitThe luminous hero borderThe vertical value mapThe readiness quizThe diagnostic pageDeciding what to cut was half the judgment.

None of those deletions was a failure of the work. Each was the work. The version that shipped is better for the ones that did not, and the discipline that produced it is the same one that produced the things we kept.

Deciding what to cut is the same skill as deciding what to make, and a product is shaped as much by what it refuses to keep as by what it ships.

This is exclusion, which our note Taste Is a Muscle, Not a Gift calls the rep that gets skipped and the one that shows. It is harder now than it used to be, for a reason worth naming. When building something took real time and money, the effort already spent was a fair argument for keeping it; throwing it away meant throwing away the cost. When a tool can rebuild the thing in an afternoon, that argument is gone. The effort already spent is no longer evidence that the thing should stay, because the effort was cheap. The only question left is whether the thing earns its place, and answering that honestly means being willing to delete work you just made and liked.

That willingness is judgment doing its job. A maker who cannot cut keeps everything that is merely good, and a product that keeps everything that is merely good is a pile, not a product. The taste to know which of your own things to throw away is the same taste our essay The Discipline argues is the actual work now, applied at the one place it is hardest to apply, which is to what you have already built.

Where this goes next

The case for exclusion as a trainable skill, with the weekly habit of cutting one thing from your own work, is in Taste Is a Muscle, Not a Gift. The larger argument for why this kind of judgment is the job now, rather than the speed of making, is our essay The Discipline. The flip side, how the options that make cutting necessary get generated in the first place, is How We Used Preview Labs to Design This Site.

Sources